Sell Car

Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed

Hino Ranger Cargo FG 260 JK
Hino Ranger Cargo FG
260 JK
SRP : Rp 1,01 Billion View Promo
Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH 265 PS
Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH
265 PS
SRP : Rp 1,02 Billion View Promo
Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear 240 PS
Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear
240 PS
SRP : Rp 941,3 Million View Promo
Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed 16.0L
Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed
16.0L
View Promo
  • Hide similar features
  • Show similarities

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Basic information

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Transmission

    • Transmission
    • Manual
    • Manual
    • Manual
    • Manual
    • Gearbox
    • 7-Speed
    • 7-Speed
    • 6-Speed
    • 12-Speed
    • Clutch
    • Single Dry Plate, with Coil Spring
    • Single Dry Clutch

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Comfort & Convenience

    • Adjustable Driver Seat
    • Air Conditioner
    • Cruise Control
View More

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Entertainment & Communication

    • Navigation System

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Safety

    • Seat Belts
    • ABS
    • Hill Hold

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Engine Details

    • Axle Configuration
    • 4x2
    • 6x4

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Exterior

    • Fog Lights

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Dimensions & Capacity

    • Fuel Tank (litres)
    • 200 L
    • 200 L
    • 200 L
    • 1250 L
    • Gross Weight
    • 16000 kg
    • 34000 kg
    • 16000 kg
    • 41000 kg
    • Overall Length
    • 8150 mm
    • 5785 mm
    • 7510 mm
    • 7590 mm
View More

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Engine Details

    • Engine Cylinders
    • 6
    • 6
    • 6
    • 8
    • Engine
    • 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
    • Inline 4 Stroke Diesel Engine; Variable Nozzle Turbocharger; Intercoolers; Common Rail
    • SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
    • 16.0L Diesel Engine, 8 Cylinder 32 Valve
    • Front Axle
    • Reverse Elliot,I-Section Beam
    • forged beam type
View More

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Performance

    • Fuel Type
    • Diesel
    • Diesel
    • Diesel
    • Diesel
    • Displacement
    • 7684
    • 7684
    • 7545
    • 16001
    • Max Power
    • 260
    • 265
    • 240
    • 620
View More

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Steering

    • Power Steering
    • Yes
    • Yes
    • Yes
    • Yes
    • Steering
    • Power
    • Power Steering
    • Power
    • Turning Radius
    • 6.4 m
    • 7300
View More

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Suspension & Brakes

    • Brakes
    • Air Brakes
    • Air Brakes
    • Air Brakes
    • Drums
    • Front Suspension
    • Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
    • Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
    • Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
    • Rear Suspension
    • Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
    • Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
    • Laminated leap springs
View More

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Wheel & Tyre

    • Front Tyre
    • 10.00-20-16PR
    • 10.00-R20-16PR
    • 10.00-20-16PR
    • 325/95 R24
    • Rear Tyre
    • 10.00-20-16PR
    • 10.00-R20-16PR
    • 10.00-20-16PR
    • 325/95 R24

Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Miscellaneous

    • Emission Norms
    • Euro 4
    • Euro 4
    • Driver Information Display
    • Yes

Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG With Alternatives

Popular Hino Trucks

Hino Trucks

Compare Hino Ranger Tractor Head FG 260 TH With Alternatives

Compare Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FS Hi Gear With Alternatives

Popular Mitsubishi Trucks

Mitsubishi Trucks

Compare Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed With Alternatives

Popular Scania Trucks

Scania Trucks

Copyright © Zigwheels 2014-2025. All Rights Reserved.

CardekhoSEA
Oto Carmudi zigwheels