Compare Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed



- Hide similar features
- Show similarities
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Basic information
- Fuel Type
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Diesel Trucks
- Price
- Rp 1,01 Billion Hino Ranger Cargo FG Price
- Rp 965,1 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear Price
- Rp 897 Million Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear Price
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Transmission
-
- Transmission
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
- Manual
-
- Gearbox
- 7-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 6-Speed
- 12-Speed
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Comfort & Convenience
-
- Adjustable Driver Seat
-
- Air Conditioner
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Engine Details
-
- Axle Configuration
- 4x2
- 4x2
- 6x4
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Entertainment & Communication
-
- Navigation System
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Safety
-
- Seat Belts
-
- ABS
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Exterior
-
- Fog Lights
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Dimensions & Capacity
-
- Fuel Tank (litres)
- 200 L
- 200 L
- 1250 L
-
- Gross Weight
- 16000 kg
- 16000 kg
- 16000 kg
- 41000 kg
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Engine Details
-
- Engine Cylinders
- 6
- 6
- 6
- 8
-
- Engine
- 4-Step Inline Diesel Engine; Direct Injenction; Intercooler Turbo Charger, Common Rail
- SOHC (Single Overhead Chamsaft), 6 Direct Injection Cylinders
- 4 Stroke-cycle water cooled direct injection turbocharged diesel engine
- 16.0L Diesel Engine, 8 Cylinder 32 Valve
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Performance
-
- Fuel Type
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
- Diesel
-
- Displacement
- 7684
- 7545
- 7545
- 16001
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Steering
-
- Power Steering
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Steering
- Power Steering
- Power Steering
- Power
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Suspension & Brakes
-
- Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Air Brakes
- Drums
-
- Front Suspension
- Rigid Axle with Semi Elliptic Leaf Spring
- Laminated leap springs with shock absorbers
- Laminated Leaf Springs with Shock Absorbers
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Wheel & Tyre
-
- Front Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 325/95 R24
-
- Rear Tyre
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 10.00-20-16PR
- 325/95 R24
Hino Ranger Cargo FG vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FL Hi Gear vs Mitsubishi Fighter FM 65 FM Hi Gear vs Scania R620-A6X4 Low Bed - Miscellaneous
-
- Driver Information Display
- Yes
- Yes
-
- Emission Norms
- Euro 4